Some of functionality may not work while you disabled JavaScript. Enable JavaScript for better User Exprience.
Access here alternative investment news about What The 10 Richest University Endowments Did Wrong (& Right) In 2016
Hedge Funds

What The 10 Richest University Endowments Did Wrong (& Right) In 2016

by trusted insight posted 1year ago 1579 views

2016 was a bruising year for university endowments. More than 80 percent of the funds lost money, including the largest ones. Half of the ten largest university endowments ended up in the red, Trusted Insight’s research shows.

One may argue that endowments are long-term investors that should look beyond one year. So does a one-year loss translate into bad investing? For some universities, last year’s poor performance is representative of their ten-year returns. One university that we examined far outperformed all others in 2016, while it is in line with its peers on a ten-year scale. Another institution squeaked out positive results last year, but is outperforming every other institution on a long-term basis.


A Tough 2016

Nationwide, the median 2016 return for endowments was -2.9 percent, according to Cambridge Associates. Of the 50 U.S. endowments researched by Trusted Insight, only seven reported positive returns, including five in the top ten: Yale, Princeton, University of Texas, MIT and Northwestern.
 
Although everyone in the top-ten clique came out above the national median, most missed their target rates of return.
 
Harvard, the country’s largest endowment with $35.7 billion under management, posted the worst results among the top ten with a 2 percent loss. This is 3 percent below its benchmark portfolio return.

Robert A. Ettl, then-acting CEO of Harvard Management Company, said in the 2016 annual report that the performance was hurt by low interest rates and market volatility, but he recognized that “execution was also a key factor in this year’s disappointing results.”

More specifically, Harvard’s loss was caused by its public equities and real assets investments. Both asset classes returned -10.2 percent in 2016, according to its annual report. The real estate portfolio returned 13.8 percent, but not enough to salvage the fund as a whole. 

Under impending pressure to revive performance, Harvard is taking aggressive steps to restructure its investment office. N.P. Narvekar, the new CEO who joined in December 2016, recently cut the existing staff by half and added a few fresh hires from prestigious investment firms.

Much like Harvard, most endowments were whipsawed by public equities and real assets -- energy assets, in particular -- in 2016. Real estate and private equity performed well overall, but not enough to outweigh the damage.

University of Pennsylvania, which lost 1.4 percent last year, said in its annual report that negative returns from these asset classes were only partly offset by strong positive returns from private equity, real estate and fixed income investments.

On the other extreme, UTIMCO’s Permanent University Fund, the $17.9 billion fund that benefits both the University of Texas and Texas A&M University, returned a handsome 3.92 percent in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016. Private investments, real estate and emerging markets equities were the biggest contributors to the return, according to its annual report.   
 

The Long-Term Winner

As long-term investors, however, endowments measure their financial health on more gauges than just one-year return. Ten-year annualized return is more relevant, as endowments are set up to support the operation of universities in perpetuity.

Sadly for Harvard, its ten-year return of 5.7 percent also sat at the bottom among the top ten. It’s even lower than the national median of 6.3 percent, according to the 2015 (the latest available) NACUBO Commonfund Study. The study also shows that endowments larger than $1 billion outperform smaller ones by 1 percent over any ten-year period. Except for Harvard, this advantage is proved true by ten-year figures of the other top-ten schools.

MIT, despite a mediocre gain of 0.8 percent in 2016, tops all other endowments of comparable size with a ten-year annualized return of 8.3 percent. Yale, Princeton and Columbia closely trailed with strong ten-year performance. MIT's Chief Investment Officer Seth Alexander has led MIT’s endowment since 2006. Alexander is a former apprentice of David Swensen, the famed chief investor at Yale. By the ten-year measure, he now has slightly outpaced his mentor. Alexander is also the highest paid individual at MIT, according to MIT’s school newspaper The Tech.  

Below are the 2016 investment returns and 10-year annualized returns of the 10 largest university endowments in the United States:


1. Harvard University - Harvard Management Company
CEO: Stephen Blyth (Blyth went on leave in May 2016 and later resigned. Chief operating officer Robert A. Ettl acted as the interim CEO until Harvard appointed Nirmal.P. Narvekar CEO in September 2016.)
AUM: $35.7 billion
2016 return: -2.0%
10-year annualized return: 5.7%

2. Yale University - Yale Investments Office
CIO: David Swensen
AUM: $25.4 billion
2016 return: 3.4%
10-year annualized return: 8.1%

3. Stanford University - Stanford Management Company
President and CEO: Robert Wallace
AUM: $22.4 billion
2016 return: -0.4%
10-year annualized return: 6.7%

4. Princeton University - Princeton University Investment Company (PRINCO)
President: Andrew Golden
AUM: $22.2 billion
2016 return: 0.8%
10-year annualized return: 8.2%

5. University of Texas Investment Management Company (UTIMCO) -- Permanent University Fund
CIO: Bruce Zimmerman (resigned in October 2016. Succeeded by Mark Warner as interim CIO)
AUM: $17.9 billion
2016 return: 3.94%
10-year annualized return: 5.47%
 
6. Massachusetts Institute of Technology - MITIMCo
CIO: Seth Alexander
AUM: $13.2 billion
2016 return: 0.8%
10-year annualized return: 8.3%

7. Northwestern University - Northwestern University Investment Office
CIO: William H. McLean
AUM: $10.8 billion
2016 return: 1.9%
10-year annualized return: 6.6%

8. University of Pennsylvania - University of Pennsylvania Office of Investments
CIO: Peter Ammon
AUM: $10.7 billion
2016 return: -1.4%
10-year annualized return: 6.5%

9. University of Michigan - University of Michigan Investment Office
CIO: Erik Lundberg
AUM: $9.7 billion
2016 return: -1.4%
10-year annualized return: 6.7%

10. Columbia University - Columbia Investment Management Company
CEO: Nirmal.P. Narvekar (Narvekar left to join Harvard in September 2016. His role is succeeded by Peter Holland)
AUM: $9 billion
2016 return: -0.9%
10-year annualized return: 8.1%

 

Check out asset allocation of the top ten endowments here.
For questions, comments or story ideas, please contact us at editorial@thetrustedinsight.com



Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly reported the ten-year annualized returns of Stanford, MIT and UTIMCO, using 2015 or earlier data.